According to the Leveller Live, “SSDC has climbed down. The speed of the climbdown suggests that SSDC is not anxious to have this particular decision raked over in fine detail by a judge. Instead the council now states that it is minded to send the decision back to committee to reconsider the decision. The council has also written to the developer, Abbey Manor Group advising them of the decision. Of course the council may reconsider and come up with the same answer…” Read the full story here at the Leveller Live.
A “tsunami” of homes will be built on the northern edge of Yeovil following a whole day of debate by South Somerset District Council.
It took councillors eight-and-a-half hours and three separate committees to decide that 765 new homes should be built north of Primrose Lane, to the east of the A359.
Residents waited for hours to have their say, arguing about the possible contamination of the site with anthrax, the damage toArchiv the local landscape and the increased traffic it would cause…
Read the rest at Somerset Live.
From 19 Oct 2020
“We hope that the Judicial Review will bring out into the open how crazyily this development has been managed by an inadequate planning department at the expense of the people of Mudford who have been ignored from the start. More than 750 houses built in a parish of 320 houses and in a rural economy. Where is the sense?” Stephen Bartlett, Chair of Mudford Parish Council
Stephen Bartlett was speaking to Somerset’s largest circulation newspaper, The Leveller, about the “Judicial review pre-action protocol”. Read more from The Leveller’s article from 19th October 2020 here.
29th October 2019
A meeting of SSDC Planners and Members of Yeovil South and Yeovil East committees took place on 29th October at Yeovil Council Offices.
The meeting was to determine the two applications related to the proposed Mudford/Primrose Lane Development (14/02554/OUT and 15/03942/FUL).
Following a 2 hour presentation by the planners in which they took the opportunity to downplay all the previous matters of concern by FOMAG and FOMAG’s experts, representatives of FOMAG and other members of the public were allowed to make three minute statements. There was scarcely any time to raise concerns over flooding, traffic, local services and the real possibility of anthrax contamination.
Apart from two residents of Wyndham Park who brought attention to the need for a community centre to be built as soon as possible on the Primrose Lane site to foster cohesion within Wyndham Park, key members from FOMAG and our colleagues in Dorset County and Queen Thorne Parish Council gave pithy and pointed presentations.
Following this three (!) committee meetings took place. The first was Area South who have a very small portion of the Primrose Lane site within their area. Concentrating mainly on matters which related to Wyndham Park and the need for the proposed Community Centre to be built within the Primrose Lane development to service that requirement, the Area South Committee voted to approve the two planning applications. Although strictly speaking Area South’s interest is based on a tiny proportion of the development, and therefore they have a say in the planning process, their influence was clearly out of all proportion.
The second meeting that day was that of the Area East Committee representing the Mudford area. This was a livelier and more testing debate. Taking the lead from a proposal that sustainability and a green agenda recently approved by the full SSDC should underpin any planning approval the Area East Committee challenged several matters with the planners and eventually voted overwhelmingly to reject the planning applications.
As is normal where two committees deliberate, the final say went to the Regulatory Committee where again a pointed debate took place with serious doubts on the questions of landscape and environmental impact of the proposed development, plus issues relating to anthrax and the lack of affordable homes against viability figures which were challenged by FOMAG’s expert. The vote from the Regulatory Committee was close until finally Area South members pushed the debate to less contentious ground and the Committee voted 7 to 5 in favour of the development. This was very disappointing.
However FOMAG continues to oppose this development. The whole application now goes to the Secretary of State for Environment having been called in following both our local MP’s Sir Oliver Letwin and Marcus Fysh voicing concerns to the Minister.
FOMAG is consulting with legal experts in the next days and with many issues having come to the table at the SSDC 81/2 hour meeting we believe that we have a convincing case to be set to a fully unbiased authority.
FOMAG has put in train the process to take the matter forward but we look to our supporters to help us fund a final effort at a senior and decisive level.
FOMAG (Friends of Mudford Action Group) has been formed by the local community who are alarmed by the proposed development of an unsuitable site between Yeovil and Mudford for 765 house and numerous other units.
We are working with local Parish Councils and others, and a legal team, to prevent the building of houses that only South Somerset District Council (SSDC) seems to want. They sadly voted for this development to take place on 29 October 2019. Read more about that here.
It seems clear that this development will place a heavy burden on local services, not least Yeovil Hospital. It will also create even more traffic in an already congested area, especially during rush hour. The potential problems with drainage into Mudford, which already regularly floods, should, by itself, have it removed from the local development plan.
We have been battling this development for many years and will continue to do so but are in need of funds to pay our legal team who are generous with their time but able to work for free. To donate to this vital work, go to MAKE A DONATION.
Please bear with us as this website is being updated with new information, as well as an archive being built up.
Keep up with developments – or hopefully lack of developments – on our Facebook page.